Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Toceranib phosphate treatment for oral cancer in cats
By Wiles, Valerie et al.·Published in Journal of feline medicine and surgery·2017·1 Oncology Department, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Retrospective evaluation of toceranib phosphate (Palladia) in cats with oral squamous cell carcinoma.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of 46 cats with oral squamous cell carcinoma (a type of mouth cancer) was studied to see how well they responded to a treatment called toceranib phosphate. Half of the cats received toceranib, and those treated had a better response, with a median survival time of 123 days compared to just 45 days for those who didn't receive the treatment. While some cats experienced mild gastrointestinal issues, toceranib was generally well tolerated. The study also found that using non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) alongside toceranib improved survival times even further.
People also search for: cat oral cancer treatment · toceranib phosphate for cats · NSAIDs for cat cancer · feline squamous cell carcinoma survival rate
Abstract
Objectives The aim of the study was to determine the clinical benefit and adverse event profile of toceranib phosphate in the treatment of feline oral squamous cell carcinoma (FOSCC). Methods Data obtained from the medical records of cats with oral squamous cell carcinoma diagnosed between 2010 and 2014 treated with toceranib phosphate were compared with medical record data from cats that did not receive toceranib, cytotoxic chemotherapy or radiation, to determine the response to toceranib treatment and adverse event profile of toceranib in cats. Concurrent use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) was allowed. Results Forty-six cats with FOSCC were included; 23 received treatment with toceranib (group 1) and 23 did not (group 2). The overall biological response rate in group 1 was 56.5%. Median survival time of toceranib-treated cats was significantly longer at 123 days compared with 45 days in cats not treated with toceranib ( P = 0.01). Cats achieving stable disease or better on toceranib therapy had significantly longer progression-free survival ( P <0.0001) and median survival ( P = 0.0042) times than those with progressive disease on toceranib. Administration of NSAIDs was also associated with significantly improved survival time ( P = 0.0038) among all cats. Anorexia was common but may reflect the underlying disease in these patients. Toceranib was well tolerated in cats, with the most common side effect being mild gastrointestinal toxicity. Conclusions and relevance Toceranib was well tolerated in cats with oral squamous cell carcinoma and may lead to improved survival times, especially when combined with NSAIDs. NSAID administration was also associated with improved survival times, and the relative benefit of toceranib and NSAIDs is difficult to determine from this retrospective study. Despite improvement in survival times, long-term survival in this patient population remained poor. As toceranib was well tolerated and may improve survival time, prospective evaluation of toceranib alone is warranted to assess response as a single agent and as part of multimodal therapy in an effort to achieve a more durable response in FOSCC.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26755491/