PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How common is inherited genetic risk for bone cancer in dogs

By Zapata, Isain et al.·Published in BMC genomics·2019·Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Risk-modeling of dog osteosarcoma genome scans shows individuals with Mendelian-level polygenic risk are common.

Species:
dog
OsteosarcomaMovement & jointsDogs

Plain-English summary

A study found that certain dog breeds, like Greyhounds, have a higher genetic risk for osteosarcoma, a type of bone cancer. This cancer is particularly concerning because it has not seen significant improvements in survival rates over the years. Researchers identified specific genes that may increase the risk of developing this cancer, which could lead to better-targeted treatments for affected dogs. The findings suggest that using these genetic insights could help in developing new therapies and clinical trials for dogs at risk.

People also search for: dog osteosarcoma treatment · Greyhound cancer risk · genetic testing for dog cancer · bone cancer in dogs · dog cancer survival rates

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Despite the tremendous therapeutic advances that have stemmed from somatic oncogenetics, survival of some cancers has not improved in 50 years. Osteosarcoma still has a 5-year survival rate of 66%. We propose the natural canine osteosarcoma model can change that: it is extremely similar to the human condition, except for being highly heritable and having a dramatically higher incidence. Here we reanalyze published genome scans of osteosarcoma in three frequently-affected dog breeds and report entirely new understandings with immediate translational indications. RESULTS: First, meta-analysis revealed association near FGF9, which has strong biological and therapeutic relevance. Secondly, risk-modeling by multiple logistic regression shows 22 of the 34 associated loci contribute to risk and eight have large effect sizes. We validated the Greyhound stepwise model in our own, independent, case-control cohort. Lastly, we updated the gene annotation from approximately 50 genes to 175, and prioritized those using cross-species genomics data. Mostly positional evidence suggests 13 genes are likely to be associated with mapped risk (including MTMR9, EWSR1 retrogene, TANGO2 and FGF9). Previous annotation included seven of those 13 and prioritized four by pathway enrichment. Ten of our 13 priority genes are in loci that contribute to risk modeling and thus can be studied epidemiologically and translationally in pet dogs. Other new candidates include MYCN, SVIL and MIR100HG. CONCLUSIONS: Polygenic osteosarcoma-risk commonly rises to Mendelian-levels in some dog breeds. This justifies caninized animal models and targeted clinical trials in pet dogs (e.g., using CDK4/6 and FGFR1/2 inhibitors).

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30890123/