Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Risk of chronic kidney disease after Lyme or Anaplasma exposure
By Drake, Corie et al.Ā·Published in Topics in companion animal medicineĀ·2021Ā·IDEXX Laboratories, United StatesĀ·View original on PubMed ā
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research ā every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work ā
Original publication title: Risk of Development of Chronic Kidney Disease After Exposure to Borrelia burgdorferi and Anaplasma spp.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A study found that dogs exposed to Lyme disease (caused by the bacteria Borrelia burgdorferi) have a higher risk of developing chronic kidney disease (CKD). The research showed that dogs with antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi had a 43% increased risk of CKD compared to those without the antibodies. However, exposure to another bacteria, Anaplasma spp., did not show a significant link to CKD. This highlights the importance of monitoring kidney health in dogs that have had Lyme disease, as early detection and treatment can help manage potential kidney issues.
People also search for: dog kidney disease after Lyme disease Ā· symptoms of kidney disease in dogs Ā· Lyme disease treatment for dogs
Abstract
Lyme disease is a multi-faceted illness caused by infection due to Borrelia burgdorferi. Acute kidney damage secondary to Lyme disease is well described but less so as a chronic event. The role of Anaplasma spp. and secondary kidney dysfunction is not known. A retrospective cohort study was performed to determine if dogs within a defined Lyme disease and anaplasmosis region with B. burgdorferi or Anaplasma spp. antibodies had an increased risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD). Patient exposure was defined as having a B. burgdorferi or Anaplasma spp. antibody positive result recorded at any point in the available patient history. CKD was defined as concurrent increased symmetric dimethylarginine and creatinine (Cr) for a minimum of 25 days with inappropriate urine specific gravity (USG). Patients were matched using propensity scoring to control for age, region, and breed. Contingency tables were used to compare dogs seropositive and not seropositive to B. burgdorferi and Anaplasma spp. and CKD outcome. For each comparison that was performed, statistical significance was defined by a P-value of <.025. The risk ratio of CKD for patients exposed to B. burgdorferi and Anaplasma spp. were found to be 1.43 (95% confidence interval [CI, 1.27, 1.61], P < .0001) and 1.04, (95% CI [0.87, 1.24], P = .6485), respectively. Results suggest in this cohort no increased risk for developing CKD when exposed to Anaplasma spp. but a significant increase in risk for developing CKD with exposure to B. burgdorferi.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases āOriginal publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33152525/