Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Risk of bone cancer after open fracture surgery in dogs
By Arthur, Elizabeth G et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2016·Mobile Veterinary Surgery·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Risk of Osteosarcoma in Dogs After Open Fracture Fixation.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs that had surgery to fix broken bones was studied to see if this could lead to a rare type of bone cancer called osteosarcoma. Out of over 19,000 dogs treated for fractures, only 15 later developed osteosarcoma in the same bone. The research found that the risk of getting osteosarcoma after having a fracture fixed was very low, similar to other types of joint surgeries. This suggests that removing surgical implants after fracture repair to prevent cancer may not be necessary, but more research is needed to confirm this.
People also search for: dog bone cancer after fracture · osteosarcoma risk in dogs · dog fracture surgery complications
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To critically evaluate whether open fracture fixation is a significant risk factor for latent osteosarcoma development. STUDY DESIGN: Case-control study. SAMPLE POPULATION: Dogs undergoing open fracture repair and dogs diagnosed with osteosarcoma. METHODS: Records were retrieved from the Veterinary Medical Database VMDB (1970-2000) for dogs undergoing surgical repair of a fracture and dogs diagnosed with osteosarcoma. Dogs with open reduction of joint luxation, dogs diagnosed with bacterial cystitis, and dogs diagnosed with urinary bladder transitional cell carcinoma (UBTCC) were queried as comparison populations. Relative risk for osteosarcoma development was determined. RESULTS: From a population of 19,041 fractures treated surgically, 15 of those dogs subsequently appeared in the VMDB with osteosarcoma affecting the same bone. The relative risk of a fracture repair and associated orthopedic implants and osteosarcoma occurrence was equivalent to the relative risk of open joint reduction and osteosarcoma occurrence (95% confidence interval; 0.998-1.00). The relative risk of having bacterial cystitis and appearing again in the VMDB with UBTCC was higher than the risk of open fracture repair and a subsequent diagnosis of osteosarcoma (P < .02). CONCLUSION: The incidence of fracture-related osteosarcoma may be significantly less than previously estimated based on cases queried from the VMDB. Although possible cases of implant-associated osteosarcoma were identified, their occurrence was rare. Elective implant removal for the purpose of reducing the risk of osteosarcoma after fracture repair may not be warranted and merits further investigation.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26595882/