PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Accuracy of urine test for histoplasmosis in dogs

By Cunningham, Lauren et al.·Published in Journal of the American Animal Hospital Association·2015·From the Department of Veterinary Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Sensitivity and Specificity of Histoplasma Antigen Detection by Enzyme Immunoassay.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs suspected of having histoplasmosis (a fungal infection) had their urine tested using a special antigen test to see how well it could diagnose the disease. Out of 60 cases, the test correctly identified 17 dogs with the infection and ruled out 41 others with different conditions, showing no false positives. The test was found to be highly accurate, with a sensitivity of about 89% and a specificity of 100%. This means that the antigen test is a reliable option for diagnosing histoplasmosis in dogs, helping veterinarians make better treatment decisions.

People also search for: dog histoplasmosis symptoms · dog urine test for histoplasmosis · how to treat histoplasmosis in dogs

Abstract

The objective of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of an antigen enzyme immunoassay (EIA) on urine samples for the diagnosis of histoplasmosis in dogs. This retrospective medical records review included canine cases with urine samples submitted for Histoplasma EIA antigen assay between 2007 and 2011 from three veterinary institutions. Cases for which urine samples were submitted for Histoplasma antigen testing were reviewed and compared to the gold standard of finding Histoplasma organisms or an alternative diagnosis on cytology or histopathology. Sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and the kappa coefficient and associated confidence interval were calculated for the EIA-based Histoplasma antigen assay. Sixty cases met the inclusion criteria. Seventeen cases were considered true positives based on identification of the organism, and 41 cases were considered true negatives with an alternative definitive diagnosis. Two cases were considered false negatives, and there were no false positives. Sensitivity was 89.47% and the negative predictive value was 95.35%. Specificity and the positive predictive value were both 100%. The kappa coefficient was 0.9207 (95% confidence interval, 0.8131-1). The Histoplasma antigen EIA test demonstrated high specificity and sensitivity for the diagnosis of histoplasmosis in dogs.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26355580/