Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Blood test results for tick and flea diseases in stray dogs
By Perregrino, Ali N et al.·Published in Veterinary parasitology, regional studies and reports·2022·Department of Pathobiology, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Serologic evidence of selected vector-borne pathogens in non-owned dogs in the southeast US.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of non-owned dogs in Alabama and Georgia were tested for diseases spread by parasites, and about 35% of them showed signs of infection. Specifically, 20% tested positive for heartworm (Dirofilaria immitis) and another 20% had antibodies for Ehrlichia, a type of bacteria that can cause illness. Fleas were found on over 20% of the dogs, and nearly 10% had ticks. This study highlights the risk of parasite-borne diseases in these areas, especially among stray dogs, and suggests that more monitoring is needed to protect animal health.
People also search for: dog heartworm symptoms · Ehrlichia in dogs treatment · flea and tick prevention for dogs
Abstract
Vector-borne pathogens (VBP) associated with ectoparasitism are of concern for animal health, and there are many gaps in surveillance and reporting data. The purpose of this study was to test for four VBPs in a subset of non-owned dogs from county humane societies in Alabama and Georgia that were admitted to the Auburn University College of Veterinary Medicine Hoerlein Spay/Neuter Program for health exams and routine procedures, including bloodwork and testing with the 4Dx® SNAP® Plus (IDEXX Laboratories, Inc., Westbrook, Maine). Visualized ectoparasites were noted and preserved for identification and analysis. From May-October 2019, residual blood (n = 114) was used for preparing blood smears and DNA extraction and PCR. Out of 114 samples, 35.1% (40/114) were seropositive for one or more VBP: Dirofilaria immitis antigen (20.2%; 23/114) and Ehrlichia spp. antibodies (20.2%; 23/114); six VBD-positive dogs (15%) tested positive for both. No dogs had detectable antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi or Anaplasma spp. (0%; 0/114). Microfilariae of D. immitis were present in 7 blood smears, all from dogs that were D. immitis antigen positive. Morulae or DNA of Ehrlichia or Anaplasma spp. were not identified in any sample. Fleas were documented in 20.4% (23/113) of dogs, 9.7% (11/113) were infested with ticks, predominantly Amblyomma americanum, and co-infestations were noted in 2.7% (3/113). Our data indicate that there is substantial VBP risk in Alabama and Georgia, and that the reservoir potential of domestic animals, especially non-owned animals, along with potential wildlife reservoirs warrants further investigation.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35115124/