Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Ehrlichia canis exposure and risk factors in hospital dogs
By Chochlios, Tryfon A et al.·Published in Veterinary clinical pathology·2019·Companion Animal Clinic (CAC-AUTh)·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Seroprevalence and risk factors associated with Ehrlichia canis in a hospital canine population.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 850 dogs at a veterinary hospital in Greece were tested for Ehrlichia canis, a tick-borne infection. The results showed that sick dogs had a much higher rate of infection (54.9%) compared to healthy dogs (33.9%). Dogs with symptoms like bleeding, anemia, and low blood cell counts were more likely to test positive for the infection. This study suggests that certain health issues could indicate a higher risk of Ehrlichia canis exposure, helping vets decide when to test for it.
People also search for: dog bleeding symptoms · Ehrlichia canis treatment · dog anemia causes · why is my dog sick · tick-borne diseases in dogs
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Ehrlichia canis (E canis) infection has been documented in a few small canine case series in Greece. However, there is limited information on the prevalence of exposure to, or the potential risk factors associated with E canis seroreactivity in a large native canine population. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of this study were to evaluate E canis seroprevalence in dogs admitted to a veterinary teaching hospital, and to investigate the potential association between seropositivity and signalment, health status, the serologic assays used, and selected clinical and clinicopathologic abnormalities. METHODS: The medical records of 850 client-owned dogs, tested using three in-office serologic assays, were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: The E canis seroprevalence was significantly higher in sick (54.9%) compared with healthy (33.9%) dogs. Seropositivity differed significantly between the serologic assays used in this study (ImmunoComb vs SNAP 3Dx/SNAP 4Dx). Dogs presenting with bleeding tendencies, anemia, thrombocytopenia, leukopenia, pancytopenia, and hyperproteinemia were more likely to be E canis seropositive, and the median hematocrit (HCT), white blood cell (WBC), neutrophil, and platelet values were significantly lower in seropositive compared with seronegative dogs. CONCLUSIONS: A high E canis seroprevalence was documented in a canine population living in an endemic area. Selected clinicopathologic variables might be useful indicators of E canis exposure and could allow the prioritization of serologic testing in the clinical setting.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31179564/