Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Acute phase proteins predict outcome in dogs with ehrlichiosis
By Mylonakis, M E et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2011·Companion Animal Clinic·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Serum acute phase proteins as clinical phase indicators and outcome predictors in naturally occurring canine monocytic ehrlichiosis.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 56 dogs with a tick-borne disease called canine monocytic ehrlichiosis (CME) were studied to see if certain blood proteins could help determine how sick they were and predict their chances of survival. The dogs with more severe symptoms had higher levels of specific proteins, but these levels did not actually predict whether the dogs would recover or not. Instead, the likelihood of survival was more closely linked to other blood issues, like low white blood cell counts. Understanding these factors can help veterinarians assess the severity of CME in affected dogs.
People also search for: dog ehrlichiosis symptoms · canine monocytic ehrlichiosis treatment · dog blood test results explained
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Canine monocytic ehrlichiosis (CME), caused by Ehrlichia canis, is an important tick-borne disease of global importance. Currently, limited information is available on the diagnostic and prognostic value of acute phase proteins (APPs) in dogs naturally infected with E. canis. HYPOTHESIS: APPs may be useful indicators of the clinical phase of CME and predictive of the clinical outcome (death or survival). ANIMALS: Fifty-six dogs naturally infected with E. canis and 7 clinically healthy control dogs. METHODS: C-reactive protein (CRP), serum amyloid A (SAA), haptoglobin (Hp), and albumin concentrations determined on admission were retrospectively compared among 27 dogs with nonmyelosuppressive CME, 29 dogs with myelosuppressive CME and 7 healthy dogs. Diagnosis of CME was based on clinical and clinicopathological findings, seropositivity to E. canis, polymerase chain reaction amplification of E. canis-specific 16S rDNA, microscopic observation of Ehrlichia sp. morulae in blood monocytes or some combination of these. RESULTS: Mean concentrations of CRP, SAA, and Hp were significantly higher in the myelosuppressed dogs compared with the other groups, but no significant differences were found in the concentration of albumin. Survival analysis of the affected animals indicated that APP concentrations were not associated with clinical outcome; the latter was strongly associated with pancytopenia (odds ratio for death 22.7) and neutropenia (odds ratio for death 7.7). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: CRP, SAA, and Hp serum concentrations on admission are useful indicators of the clinical phase of CME, but are not useful predictors of clinical outcome.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21564293/