Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Variation in urine kidney disease markers in dogs with stable CKD
By Chen, Hilla et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2023·Veterinary Teaching Hospital·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Short-term intra-individual variation of urinary biomarkers in dogs with stable chronic kidney disease.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 25 dogs with stable chronic kidney disease (CKD) had their urine tested for specific markers of kidney damage over two weeks. The researchers found that the levels of these markers could vary significantly from day to day, which means that changes in results could indicate a worsening condition rather than just normal fluctuations. If a dog's urine shows a change of more than 100% for one marker or more than 60% for another, it could be a sign that further investigation is needed. This information can help veterinarians monitor kidney health more effectively.
People also search for: dog kidney disease symptoms · stable chronic kidney disease in dogs · urine test for dog kidney health
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Active-ongoing kidney damage is present in animals with stable chronic kidney disease (CKD), as reflected by biomarkers in urine. Interpretation of serial messurements of biomarkers requires knowledge of its intra-individual variation. AIMS: To evaluate the short-term intra-individual variation of urinary neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin and kidney injury molecule-1 (uNGAL, uKIM-1, respectively) in dogs with stable CKD, and to determine whether normalization to urinary creatinine (uCr) decreases variation. ANIMALS: Twenty-five dogs with naturally-occurring stable CKD. METHODS: Prospective, observational study. Dogs were diagnosed with CKD based on the International Renal Interest Society guidelines. Dogs were included only if the variation in serum creatinine concentration was <25% on at least 2 measurements during the 3 months preceding inclusion, and only if serum creatinine variation was <20% during the 14-day study period. Urine samples were collected on days 0, 4, 10 and 14. uNGAL and uKIM-1 were measured using ELISA. RESULTS: The median coefficients of variation (CV) of uNGAL and uNGAL/uCr were 42% (range, 7%-127%), and 44% (range, 8%-100%), respectively, and the CV 90th percentiles were 97% and 83%, respectively. The median CV of uKIM-1 and uKIM-1/uCr were 29% (range, 16%-91%), and 23% (range, 6%-76%), respectively, and the CV 90th percentiles were 56% and 52%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Changes of >100% and >60% for uNGAL and uKIM-1, respectively, in serial measurements are higher than the normal expected variation and therefore might indicate need for further investigation for underlying causes of kidney damage.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36629796/