PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Splenectomy to treat immune blood diseases in dogs

By Bestwick, Jason P et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2022·Animal Health Trust, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Splenectomy in the management of primary immune-mediated hemolytic anemia and primary immune-mediated thrombocytopenia in dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of dogs with immune-mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA) and immune-mediated thrombocytopenia (ITP) underwent splenectomy (surgery to remove the spleen) to help manage their conditions. Out of 17 dogs, six with ITP showed good results after the surgery, with three experiencing complete recovery and three showing partial improvement. For the dogs with IMHA, splenectomy helped four out of seven, while one dog with concurrent severe thrombocytopenia (CIST) also responded well. Overall, splenectomy was well tolerated and beneficial for most dogs with isolated ITP, but its effectiveness for IMHA and CIST needs further investigation.

People also search for: dog splenectomy recovery · immune-mediated hemolytic anemia treatment · dog immune-mediated thrombocytopenia surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current reports about the use of splenectomy for the management of immune-mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA) or immune-mediated thrombocytopenia (ITP) or both in dogs are limited. OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively describe the use of splenectomy as part of the management for IMHA, ITP, and concurrent IMHA and severe thrombocytopenia (CIST) in dogs. It was hypothesized that splenectomy would be beneficial in allowing for reduction of dose of immunosuppressive drugs or discontinuation in 1 or more of these groups. ANIMALS: Seventeen client-owned dogs (7 with IMHA, 7 with ITP, and 3 with CIST) were identified across 7 UK-based referral hospitals from a study period of 2005 to 2016. METHODS: Data were collected retrospectively via questionnaires and included information about diagnosis, management and treatment response before and after splenectomy. Based on clinical outcome, treatment with splenectomy as part of the management protocol was classified as either successful or unsuccessful. RESULTS: Six of 7 dogs with ITP were managed successfully with splenectomy as part of their management protocol (3 complete and 3 partial responses), although 1 subsequently developed suspected IMHA. Of the 7 dogs with IMHA, splenectomy was part of a successful management protocol in 4 dogs (2 complete and 2 partial responses). In the CIST group, 1 case (1/3) responded completely to management with splenectomy as part of the management protocol. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Splenectomy was considered successful and well tolerated in most cases of isolated ITP. Whether there is a benefit of splenectomy in cases of IMHA and CIST could not be determined in the current study.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35801263/