Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Deltamethrin collars on infected dogs cut new visceral leishmaniasis
By de Barros Cortez, Luiz Ricardo Paes et al.·Published in Research in veterinary science·2024·Unidade de Vigilâ, Brazil·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Strategic use of 4 % deltamethrin impregnated-collar in seropositive dogs reduces the incidence of seroreactivity to visceral leishmaniasis in dogs from endemic areas.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A study found that using a special collar treated with deltamethrin on dogs that tested positive for visceral leishmaniasis (VL) significantly reduced the chances of these dogs spreading the disease. In areas where the collar was used, the risk of infection was up to four times lower compared to areas where infected dogs were routinely euthanized. This collaring strategy not only helps control the disease without resorting to euthanasia but could also save money compared to treating all dogs in a population. The findings suggest that targeted collaring could be an effective way to manage VL in dogs living in areas where the disease is common.
People also search for: dog leishmaniasis treatment · deltamethrin collar for dogs · how to prevent leishmaniasis in dogs
Abstract
The effectiveness of a visceral leishmaniasis (VL) control strategy based on the application of 4 % deltamethrin impregnated collars (DIC) exclusively in seropositive dogs was assessed between 2018 and 2019, through a prospective study. The effectiveness of DIC-collaring was evaluated by comparing the incidence rate of anti-leishmanial antibodies among dogs from two endemic districts in Brazil. In one of the areas, the conventional control measure which is based on the non-compulsory euthanasia of LV seropositive dogs, was practiced by the official healthy service as a regular procedure, whereas strategic collaring, conceived in this study, was carried out in the other. Results of serological tests applied to serum samples collected from all domiciled dogs were evaluated in three consecutive times, spaced by around 200 days. Incidence rates of VL seroreactivity were compared between districts in the same period of time as well as within the same district, in consecutive periods. Based on the results, the risk of infection in the population under conventional control measure was up to four times higher than the risk of infection where DIC-collaring was used. The strategic use of collar proposed here emerged as a promising measure for VL control in dogs from endemic areas. Strategic collaring does not rely on the euthanasia of infected animals, an extremely controversial procedure, and instead of being used in all dogs, as collaring is normally recommended; only seropositive dogs are intervened. Strategic use of DIC has the potential to drastically reduce costs, if compared to mass collaring canine population.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39216347/