PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How much tissue to remove to fully cut out dog mouth melanoma

By Chinner, Jonathon Richard et al.·Published in Veterinary and Comparative Oncology·2026·The Austin Vet Specialists Adelaide South Australia Australia, Australia·View original on Crossref

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Surgical Margins Required for the Complete Excision of Canine Oral Melanomas

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A study looked at how much tissue needs to be removed when treating oral malignant melanoma (OMM) in dogs, which is a common type of mouth cancer. Researchers found that removing a margin of 10-15 mm around the tumor significantly increased the chances of completely excising the cancer without leaving any behind. In fact, when the surgical margins were at least 10 mm, all dogs had successful outcomes. This suggests that for effective treatment of OMM, a wider surgical margin is important.

People also search for: dog oral melanoma treatment · canine mouth cancer surgery · how much tissue to remove for dog melanoma

Abstract

ABSTRACT Oral malignant melanoma (OMM) is the most common canine oral neoplasm. Complete excision is recognised as the mainstay of treatment in the absence of distant metastasis, but recommended surgical margins are unvalidated. This study investigates the surgical margins required for complete excision of canine OMMs. We hypothesised that surgical margins 10–15 mm wide and a qualitative deep margin (bone, fascia or full‐thickness tissue excision) would be adequate for complete local excision of OMMs. Margins required to excise canine oral melanocytomas are also unknown; a secondary objective was to investigate this. Cases were retrospectively collected from two referral centres and a veterinary pathology laboratory. Histologic diagnosis, en bloc excision of gross tumour, surgical margin and histologic margins were required for inclusion. Tumours were categorised based on surgical margin width (Group A < 10 mm, Group B 10–15 mm and Group C > 15 mm). A qualitative deep margin was required for Groups B and C, but not Group A, to include marginal excision cases. Histologic margins were classified by the R tumour classification scheme. Twenty‐eight tumours were included, comprising 25 OMMs and three melanocytomas. R0 rates for OMMs were 56% (10/17) in Group A, 100% (7/7) in Group B and 100% (2/2) in Group C. Surgical margins ≥ 10 mm were significantly ( p = 0.03) more likely to result in R0 classification. The three melanocytomas were all classified as R0, with < 10 mm surgical margins. Results suggest that surgical margins 10–15 mm wide and a qualitative deep margin may be adequate for complete excision of OMMs.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on Crossref: https://doi.org/10.1111/vco.70069