Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Surgical results for dogs with lymphoplasmacytic mouth inflammation
By Jordan Ford et al.·Published in Frontiers in Veterinary Science·2025·Prism Veterinary Dentistry, New York, NY, United States, CH·View original on DOAJ →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Surgical outcomes in canine lymphoplasmacytic stomatitis: a retrospective study of 42 dogs (2012–2022)
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 42 dogs with painful oral inflammation called lymphoplasmacytic stomatitis were treated at a dental specialty clinic. Many of these dogs had contact lesions due to gum disease, and only a few needed full-mouth extractions. Most dogs improved significantly, with 81% achieving complete resolution mainly through treating their periodontal disease. This study suggests that many dogs can be helped with less invasive treatments rather than jumping straight to surgery.
People also search for: dog oral inflammation treatment · canine stomatitis surgery · dog gum disease management
Abstract
Lymphoplasmacytic oral mucosal inflammation (stomatitis) in canine patients is common and non-specific. Contact lesions (CL) secondary to periodontal disease are particularly common. Dogs with CL may or may not have canine chronic ulcerative stomatitis (CCUS), yet clinicians are often faced with making treatment decisions without a clear diagnosis. Some may expect canine patients to be treated similarly to feline chronic gingivostomatitis patients, for whom partial- to full-mouth extractions remain the primary intervention. Because this assumption may lead to inappropriate care, clear recommendations for surgical management are needed for canine patients. This retrospective review (2012–2022) evaluated 42 dogs with lymphoplasmacytic stomatitis treated surgically at a dental specialty service. We hypothesized that only a minority of these patients require full-mouth exodontia. Patients were initially stratified as CL or CCUS based on lesion distribution and radiographic findings and reclassified based on treatment response. Clinical outcomes were categorized as complete, partial, or absent response to treatment(s), including COHAT, salvage exodontia, rescue medical management, chronic immunosuppression, and home oral hygiene. Associations between demographic and clinical variables with surgical and clinical endpoints were evaluated using descriptive statistics and chi-square analyses. Small breeds (median 5.4 kg) predominated and were significantly more likely to reach edentulism for any reason. Buccal lesions adjacent to maxillary canine and fourth premolar teeth were most common, but over 60% of cases had mucosal changes beyond the classic paradental lesions. Ultimately, 31% were confirmed as CL and 50% as CCUS. Only 24% underwent salvage exodontia, and 17% were rendered edentulous for mucosal disease management. Achieving edentulism was more common in CL cases (54%) compared to CCUS cases (33%). Most dogs (81%) achieved complete resolution, primarily through treatment of periodontal disease (62%). CL cases showed high response rates to periodontal therapy (83%), while a subset of CCUS patients underwent salvage exodontia (20%) or immunosuppression (5%). The majority of dogs with lymphoplasmacytic stomatitis, including many diagnosed as CCUS, respond to periodontal disease management without full-mouth extractions. These findings support a conservative, staged treatment approach and underscore the need for standardized diagnostic criteria in canine oral inflammatory disease.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on DOAJ: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2025.1681133