PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Zoledronate effects on bone in healthy dogs and dogs with bone cancer

By Fan, T M et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2008·Department of Veterinary Clinical Medicine, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: The bone biologic effects of zoledronate in healthy dogs and dogs with malignant osteolysis.

Species:
dog
OsteosarcomaMovement & jointsDogs

Plain-English summary

A group of 20 dogs with bone tumors, including osteosarcoma, received an intravenous treatment called zoledronate to help reduce bone pain and improve their quality of life. After treatment, pet owners reported that their dogs were using their limbs better, and tests showed significant reductions in markers of bone breakdown. The treatment was well-tolerated, with no signs of toxicity even after multiple doses. Overall, zoledronate appears to be a safe option that can help manage pain in dogs suffering from bone cancer.

People also search for: dog bone cancer treatment · osteosarcoma pain relief for dogs · zoledronate for dogs with tumors

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Malignant osteolysis is a process whereby cancer cells in concert with osteoclasts erode bone matrix. Aminobisphosphonates (NBPs) such as zoledronate induce osteoclast apoptosis and thereby decrease malignant skeletal destruction, severity of bone pain, and frequency of pathologic fracture. HYPOTHESIS: IV-administered zoledronate will reduce homeostatic bone turnover in healthy dogs and pathologic bone resorption in dogs diagnosed with primary and secondary bone tumors. ANIMALS: Six healthy dogs and 20 dogs with naturally occurring primary or metastatic bone tumors were administered zoledronate IV. METHODS: Prospective study: In all dogs, healthy (n = 6) and with malignant osteolysis (n = 20), the bone biologic effects of zoledronate were evaluated by quantifying changes in serum C-telopeptide (CTx) or urine N-telopeptide (NTx) concentrations or both. In dogs with osteosarcoma (OSA) (n = 10), serial changes in tumor relative bone mineral density (rBMD) assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry were used to characterize zoledronate's antiresorptive effects within the immediate tumor microenvironment. Additionally, the biochemical tolerability of zoledronate was assessed in 9 dogs receiving multiple (> or =2) consecutive treatments. RESULTS: All dogs had significant reductions in serum CTx or urine NTx concentrations or both after zoledronate administration. In a subset of dogs with appendicular OSA, reduced urine NTx concentrations and increased primary tumor rBMD coincided with improved limb usage as reported by pet owners in dogs treated with zoledronate and concurrent oral analgesics. Multiple zoledronate infusions were not associated with biochemical evidence of toxicosis. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: In dogs with skeletal neoplasms, IV-administered zoledronate exerts bone biologic effects, appears safe, and can provide pain relief.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18346146/