PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How chest and abdomen scans find spread of oral cancer in dogs

By Goldschmidt, Stephanie et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2023·Department of Surgical and Radiologic Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: The diagnostic yield of preoperative screening for oral cancer in dogs over 15 years, part 2: distant screening.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A review of medical records from 381 dogs with confirmed oral tumors found that preoperative screenings can help identify serious issues like metastasis (spread of cancer) and other significant diseases. In particular, about 5% of dogs had cancer spread to the chest, especially those with oral malignant melanoma or multilobular osteochondrosarcoma. Additionally, around 2% had abdominal metastasis. The screenings also revealed other important health problems in over half of the cases. Overall, performing a combination of tests can help detect serious conditions in about 25% of dogs with oral cancer, which can guide treatment decisions.

People also search for: dog oral cancer screening · dog melanoma treatment · dog cancer metastasis symptoms

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Determine diagnostic yield of chest, abdomen, and 4-site screening to diagnose metastatic disease and secondary diseases of prognostic significance in dogs with oral cancer. SAMPLE: Medical records from 381 dogs with histologically confirmed oral tumors that underwent preoperative screening were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Thoracic metastasis was diagnosed in 4.9% (0.9% odontogenic, 6.5% nonodontogenic) of oral tumors. Oral malignant melanoma and multilobular osteochondrosarcoma were most at risk. Abdominal metastasis was diagnosed in 2% of oral tumors (0% odontogenic, 3.1% nonodontogenic) and cytologically confirmed in 2 cases (0.6% [2/295)] of all abdominal ultrasounds (AUS) 5.5% [2/36] of all AUS that had cytology). Both cases had oral malignant melanoma. Incidental disease was diagnosed in 53.1% and 81.3% of thoracic and abdominal screenings, respectively. Major findings were more common in AUS (7.8%) compared to thoracic screening (1.9%). The prevalence of incidental findings was similar for odontogenic and nonodontogenic tumors. Both metastasis and major findings were diagnosed more commonly with thoracic CT compared to radiographs. Metastasis or a major finding of prognostic significance was diagnosed in at least 1 test in 27.8% of patients that had head CT, lymph node cytology, thoracic screening, and AUS (n = 115). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Major incidental findings were more commonly detected with AUS and were diagnosed in 1 in every 12 patients. However, metastatic disease was most commonly detected with thoracic screening. When all 4 screening tests are performed, there is an approximately 1 in 4 chance of diagnosing metastasis or major significant disease regardless of tumor type.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37770015/