Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Pre-surgery scans find spread and other issues in dogs with oral
By Goldschmidt, Stephanie et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2023·Department of Surgical and Radiologic Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: The diagnostic yield of preoperative screening for oral cancer in dogs over 15 years, part 1: locoregional screening.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 381 dogs with confirmed oral tumors underwent thorough preoperative screenings to check for any spread of cancer or other serious health issues. Most of the dogs had CT scans of their skull and neck, revealing that a significant number had bone damage associated with their tumors. While major incidental findings were rare, some dogs were found to have additional tumors outside the mouth. The study highlighted the importance of checking lymph nodes, especially in dogs with certain types of oral cancer, as this could help identify any spread of the disease.
People also search for: dog oral cancer symptoms · dog CT scan for cancer · lymph node metastasis in dogs · oral squamous cell carcinoma in dogs · dog cancer screening options
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Determine locoregional diagnostic yield of 4-site screening (head, neck, chest, and abdomen) to diagnose metastatic disease or clinically significant comorbid diseases in dogs with oral cancer. ANIMALS: 381 dogs with histologically confirmed oral tumors. METHODS: Medical records from 381 dogs with histologically confirmed oral tumors that underwent preoperative screening were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Skull and neck CT scan was performed on 348 patients. Bone lysis was present in 74.4% of tumors. Oral squamous cell carcinoma, sarcomas, and T2-T3 (> 2 cm) tumors had a significantly (P < .05) increased incidence of lysis compared to odontogenic and T1 (< 2 cm) tumors, respectively. Minor incidental findings were present in 60.6% of CT scans. Major incidental findings were found in 4.6% of scans. The risk of diagnosing an incidental finding increased by 10% and 20% per year of age for minor and major findings, respectively. Lymph node metastasis was diagnosed with CT or cytology in 7.5% of cases (10.7% of nonodontogenic tumors, 0% of odontogenic tumors). Oral malignant melanoma, oral squamous cell carcinoma, and T3 tumors had the highest prevalence of metastatic disease at the time of staging. The presence of bone lysis was not associated with cervical metastasis. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Major incidental findings were rare (< 5%) but primarily included secondary extraoral tumors. Lymphatic metastasis was diagnosed in 10.7% of nonodontogenic tumors, but cytology was not performed in the majority of cases and often included only a single mandibular node. Therefore, these results likely underestimate the incidence of lymphatic metastasis. Guided lymph node sampling is highly recommended, especially for oral malignant melanoma, squamous cell carcinoma, and T2-T3 tumors.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37863103/