Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Thick smear test works well to confirm visceral leishmaniasis in dogs
By de Mello, Cintia Xavier et al.·Published in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene·2016·Laborató, Brazil·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Thick Smear is a Good Substitute for the Thin Smear in Parasitological Confirmation of Canine Visceral Leishmaniasis.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs suspected of having leishmaniasis (a parasitic disease) were tested using different methods to confirm the diagnosis. The study found that using thick smears from bone marrow samples was effective, showing a sensitivity rate of 77%, which means it accurately identified most cases. This method is quicker and easier to read than other tests. While the dogs in the study were ultimately euthanized for testing, the findings suggest that thick smears could be a reliable option for vets diagnosing this disease in living dogs.
People also search for: dog leishmaniasis symptoms · canine leishmaniasis diagnosis · thick smear test for dogs
Abstract
Although direct examination methods are important for diagnosing leishmaniasis, such methods are often neglected because of their low sensitivity relative to other techniques. Our study aimed to evaluate the performance of bone marrow (BM) thick smears and cytocentrifugation tests as alternatives to direct examination for diagnosing canine visceral leishmaniasis (CVL). Ninety-two dogs exhibiting leishmaniasis seroreactivity were evaluated. The animals were euthanized; and healthy skin, spleen, popliteal lymph node, and BM puncture samples were cultured. BM cultures were used as the reference standard. Of the 92 dogs studied, 85.9% exhibited positive cultures, and Leishmania infantum (synonym Leishmania chagasi) was confirmed in all positive culture cases. The sensitivity rates for cytocentrifugation as well as thin and thick smears were 47.1%, 52.8%, and 77%, respectively. However, no association between the dogs' clinical status and culture or direct examination results was found. To our knowledge, this was the first study to use thick smears and cytocentrifugation for diagnosing CVL. Our results indicate that BM thick smears have a good sensitivity and their use reduces the time required to read slides. Therefore, thick smears can provide a rapid and safe alternative to parasitological confirmation of seroreactive dogs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27162266/