Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Sentinel lymph node biopsy helps stage canine head and neck tumors
By Chiti, Lavinia E et al.·Published in Veterinary and comparative oncology·2021·Dipartimento di Medicina Veterinaria, Italy·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: To map or not to map the cN0 neck: Impact of sentinel lymph node biopsy in canine head and neck tumours.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 23 dogs with malignant head and neck tumors underwent surgery to remove their tumors and a special procedure called sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) to check for cancer spread. The SLNB, which used a combination of a radioactive substance and blue dye, successfully identified at least one sentinel lymph node in 19 of the dogs. In some cases, the sentinel lymph nodes did not match the expected regional lymph nodes, but the procedure was mostly safe, with only minor complications reported. This technique proved to be effective in staging the cancer and could help guide treatment decisions for dogs with these types of tumors.
People also search for: dog head and neck tumor treatment · sentinel lymph node biopsy for dogs · malignant tumors in dogs · dog cancer staging methods
Abstract
Tumour stage is a prognostic indicator for canine malignant head and neck tumours (MHNT). However, consensus is lacking on nodal staging in the absence of clinically apparent nodal disease (cN0 neck). This prospective observational study aims to determine the diagnostic accuracy of radiopharmaceutical and blue dye for sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB), to assess the correspondence between sentinel lymph node (SLN) and clinically expected regional lymph node (RLN) and the impact on staging of the procedure in dogs with MHNT and cN0 neck. Twenty-three dogs with MHNT and cN0 neck underwent tumour excision and SLNB guided by preoperative lymphoscintigraphy and intraoperative gamma-probe and blue dye. Diagnostic performances and detection rate were calculated. Correspondence between SLN and RLN, number of nodes excised, histopathological status of the SLN and complications related to the procedure were recorded. The mapping technique identified at least one SLN in 19/23 dogs, with a detection rate of 83%. The SLN did not correspond to the RLN in 52% of dogs. Multiple nodes were removed in 61% of dogs. At histopathology, eight (42%) dogs had SLN+, of which four differed from the RLN. Only minor self-limiting complications occurred in five (22%) dogs. Radiopharmaceutical and blue dye guidance is accurate (sensitivity 88.9%; specificity 100%) for SLNB in dogs with MHNT and cN0 and allowed the extirpation of unpredictable and/or multiple SLN with minimal morbidity. Incorporation of SLNB in the management of MHNT is desirable to correctly stage the cN0 neck, owing the unpredictability of the lymphatic drainage.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33886154/