PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Tumor thickness and invasion level in dog skin melanomas

By Silvestri, Serenella et al.·Published in Veterinary pathology·2019·1 Department of Veterinary Medicine, Italy·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Tumor Thickness and Modified Clark Level in Canine Cutaneous Melanocytic Tumors.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A study looked at 77 dogs with skin tumors called melanocytic tumors to see how tumor thickness affected their survival. It found that thicker tumors were linked to shorter lifespans and a higher chance of the cancer coming back or spreading. Specifically, tumors thicker than 0.95 cm were associated with worse outcomes. The researchers also noted that while a more convenient method for measuring tumor thickness was effective, the modified Clark level (which assesses how deep the tumor has invaded) did not provide useful information for predicting prognosis. This information can help veterinarians better understand the severity of skin tumors in dogs.

People also search for: dog skin tumor prognosis · canine melanoma treatment · how to measure dog tumor thickness

Abstract

Breslow thickness and Clark level are prognostic factors for human cutaneous melanomas. Breslow thickness is measured with an ocular micrometer from the top of the granular layer of the epidermis to the deepest invasive cell across the broad base of the tumor, while Clark level is based on the anatomical level of invasion through the layers of the dermis. Because of the anatomical differences between humans and dogs, we evaluated the tumor thickness and a modified Clark level in 77 canine primary cutaneous melanocytic tumors. Tumor thickness (using both a traditional and a more convenient system) and modified Clark level were measured and associated with histological diagnosis and clinical outcome. Tumor thickness was a prognostic factor, being greater in animals with shorter overall survival and disease-free time. Cutoffs of 0.95 cm and 0.75 cm defined a higher hazard for an unfavorable outcome and to develop recurrence/metastasis, respectively. Because of an excellent agreement between the 2 methods, it was concluded that tumor thickness could be measured with a ruler when an ocular micrometer is not available. Modified Clark level was not found to be relevant for prognosis. However, we suggest that both tumor thickness and a modified Clark level can be valid additional parameters when histological diagnosis is uncertain. Further studies, including a wider sample population, would be worthwhile to confirm the prognostic significance of these 2 parameters.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30244658/