Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Prognostic factors for canine leishmaniosis outcomes over 20 years
By Sarquis, Juliana et al.·Published in Parasites & vectors·2025·Animal Health Department, Spain·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Unveiling prognostic indicators in canine leishmaniosis: two decades of evidence.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 300 dogs diagnosed with leishmaniosis, a serious disease caused by a parasite, was studied to identify factors that affect their recovery and survival. Young dogs, especially those showing weakness and eye problems, were more likely to relapse and need additional treatments. In contrast, dogs treated with a combination of miltefosine and allopurinol faced a higher risk of needing more treatments compared to those given a different medication. However, treatment with domperidone significantly reduced the risk of death. Understanding these factors can help veterinarians make better treatment decisions for affected dogs.
People also search for: dog leishmaniosis symptoms · treatment for dog leishmaniasis · why is my dog weak and losing weight
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Canine leishmaniosis (CanL), caused by Leishmania infantum, can be subclinical or present as a systemic, chronic, and potentially fatal disease. Treatment response in sick dogs is influenced by many factors associated with the host, the vector, and the environment. This study aimed to identify risk factors for poor prognosis in CanL, focusing on demographic, epidemiological, and clinical/clinocopathological variables. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on a cohort of 300 dogs with CanL diagnosed between 2000 and 2022. Two logistic regression models were built to identify variables associated with an increased risk of relapses requiring repeated leishmanicidal treatments or of mortality due to CanL. A database with several variables was used to perform the study. These included demographic (age, sex, breed, and body weight), epidemiological (living conditions, travel history, and preventative measures), and clinical variables (clinical signs reported by the pet owner and physical examination findings, antibody titers, and LeishVet clinical stage), treatment history (first-line treatment, drug combinations), and outcome, among others. All analyses were conducted using R software and applying a significance level of 5% (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Young dogs and those displaying weakness and ocular signs were more likely to develop relapses and require multiple leishmanicidal treatments, while weight loss was associated with a decreased risk. Additionally, dogs treated with miltefosine in combination with allopurinol as first-line treatment had a fivefold higher risk of needing multiple leishmanicidal treatments than those receiving meglumine antimoniate and allopurinol. Medium- to large-sized dogs had a fourfold higher mortality risk than small dogs, while this risk was almost 25 times higher in dogs in LeishVet stage IV compared with those in stage I. Mortality risk was also significantly higher in dogs displaying weakness, gastrointestinal signs, and lymphadenomegaly. Conversely, treatment with domperidone was associated with an 88% reduction in mortality risk. CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights important risk factors for poor prognosis in CanL that should be carefully considered by clinicians and researchers when managing sick dogs, particularly regarding therapy decision-making.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/41254814/