Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Urine test for kidney injury in dogs with immune anemia
By Vasiliki Lantzaki et al.·Published in Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine·2025·University of Glasgow Glasgow UK, GB·View original on DOAJ →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Urine Neutrophil Gelatinase‐Associated Lipocalin in Non‐Associative Immune Mediated Hemolytic Anemia: A Prospective Controlled Study in 22 Dogs
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 22 dogs with a type of anemia called immune-mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA) showed higher levels of a kidney injury marker in their urine compared to healthy dogs. This marker, called uNGAL, was linked to more severe disease signs and could indicate kidney problems that might not be obvious. While the study found that dogs with hemoglobinuria (blood in urine) had even higher uNGAL levels, there was no clear difference in survival rates for those with higher uNGAL levels. This suggests that kidney injury could be a hidden issue in dogs suffering from IMHA.
People also search for: dog anemia symptoms · IMHA treatment for dogs · kidney problems in dogs with anemia
Abstract
ABSTRACT Background Urine neutrophil gelatinase‐associated lipocalin (uNGAL) is a biomarker for the early diagnosis of AKI. Objectives To evaluate uNGAL in dogs with non‐associative immune mediated hemolytic anemia (IMHA) and to evaluate whether uNGAL correlates with disease severity markers, negative prognostic indicators and outcome. Animals Twenty‐two dogs with non‐associative IMHA and 14 healthy dogs. Methods Prospective case–control study. uNGAL was measured by a commercially available ELISA‐kit and corrected to urine creatinine (uNGAL to creatinine ratio [UNCR]). uNGAL and UNCR of IMHA cases were compared to that of healthy dogs and the correlation with other clinicopathological markers was evaluated. uNGAL and UNCR were also compared between dogs with a CHAOS or ASA score < 3 and ≥ 3. Results uNGAL and UNCR were significantly higher in dogs with IMHA when compared to healthy controls (uNGAL median 114.58 and 0.43 ng/mL, respectively, p < 0.001; UNCR median 174.87 and 0.13 ng/mg, respectively, p < 0.001). uNGAL and UNCR were moderately positively correlated with urea (p = 0.005, r = 0.58, 0.20–0.81 95% CI and p = 0.001, r = 0.64, 0.29–0.84 95% CI, respectively) and total bilirubin (p = 0.003, r = 0.60, 0.22–0.82 95% CI and p = 0.002, r = 0.62, 0.25–0.83 95% CI, respectively). These were also significantly higher in dogs with hemoglobinuria compared to those without (uNGAL: median 269 and 30.99 ng/mL, respectively, p < 0.001; UNCR: median 585.3 and 352 37.47 ng/mg, respectively, p < 0.001). There was no statistically significant difference in uNGAL or UNCR when assessing survival to discharge (p = 0.24 and p = 0.16, respectively, 95% CI). Conclusions This study suggests that renal injury might be underappreciated in dogs with IMHA.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on DOAJ: https://doi.org/10.1111/jvim.70002