Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How PCR testing finds Leishmania species in infected dogs
By de Andrade, Hélida Monteiro et al.·Published in Veterinary parasitology·2006·Centro de Pesquisa René, Brazil·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Use of PCR-RFLP to identify Leishmania species in naturally-infected dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs from an area where Leishmania infections are common were tested for the presence of the parasite that causes Leishmaniasis. Some dogs showed symptoms like skin issues, while others were asymptomatic. Researchers found that a blood test (Indirect Immunofluorescence) was less effective than a DNA test (PCR) in detecting the infection. Most of the infected dogs had Leishmania chagasi, with only one case of Leishmania braziliensis. The study highlights the importance of accurate testing to identify and manage Leishmaniasis in dogs.
People also search for: dog skin problems Leishmaniasis · Leishmania infection symptoms in dogs · PCR test for dog diseases
Abstract
Tissue imprints on Giemsa stained slides from dogs were used to investigate the presence of Leishmania amastigotes by either optical microscopy (OM) or Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) detection of DNA. Samples from skin, spleen, lymph node, liver and bone marrow from a Leishmaniasis endemic area dogs where Leishmania (Leishmania) chagasi and Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis are sympatric were studied. Dogs were initially diagnosed by Indirect Immunofluorescence (IIF), as which 39 were IIF positive (> or = 1:40) and 16 negative. The IIF positive dogs were clinically grouped as symptomatic (n = 15), oligosymptomatic (n = 12) and asymptomatic (n = 12). Although PCR positivity was higher in symptomatic dogs, specially their skin samples, there was no significant difference among clinical groups or organs examined. Ten (62.5%) out of 16 IIF and OM negative animals were positive for PCR in at least one organ. Forty-eight positive PCR amplicons were further submitted to RFLP for Leishmania identification. All dogs were infected with L. (L.) chagasi except one, infected with L. (V.) braziliensis. PCR was more efficient than IIF and OM to diagnose canine visceral Leishmaniasis (CVL), regardless of the organ examined and the clinical form present. The use of PCR together with serology helps determining the extension of sub clinical infection in CVL endemic areas and provides a better estimate of the number of dogs to be targeted for control measures. In conclusion, our data reinforce the need for a specific diagnosis of canine infection in areas where diverse Leishmania species are sympatric and demonstrate that PCR-RFLP can be used to identify Leishmania species in dog tissue imprint stained slides.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16682124/