PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Ventral mandibulectomy surgery to remove oral tumors in dogs

By de Mello Souza, Carlos H et al.·Published in Veterinary and comparative oncology·2019·Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Ventral mandibulectomy for removal of oral tumours in the dog: Surgical technique and results in 19 cases.

Species:
dog
Canine melanomaMovement & jointsDogs

Plain-English summary

Nineteen dogs with oral tumors underwent a new surgical procedure called ventral mandibulectomy, which involves removing part of the jaw. During the surgeries, one dog experienced bleeding and needed a blood transfusion, but overall, complications were minimal. After the procedure, most dogs had some mild swelling but were able to go home within one to two days and were eating normally. This new technique allows for better access to important structures in the jaw area, making the surgery safer and more effective.

People also search for: dog oral tumor surgery · mandibulectomy recovery in dogs · dog jaw surgery complications

Abstract

The purpose of this retrospective study is to describe in detail a novel ventral approach for mandibulectomy and the results in 19 dogs. The medical records of 19 dogs that received a partial or total unilateral mandibulectomy with the new ventral approach were reviewed. Information obtained included signalment, tumour type, extent of mandibulectomy, removal of regional lymph nodes, intrasurgical complications, immediate postoperative complications, histopathological diagnosis and study of margins. Intrasurgical complication occurred in one dog (haemorrhage) and required a blood transfusion. Postoperative morbidity was minor and included transient ventral cervical swelling and self-limiting sublingual swelling (two dogs). All 19 animals were discharged between 24 and 48 hours of the procedure, and appetite was considered normal at discharge. Some perceived advantages of this procedure include easy identification of all the important anatomic structures in the area, including the inferior alveolar artery and temporo-mandibular joint, and the fact that osteotomy of the zygomatic arch is not necessary (in case of caudal mandibulectomy). In addition, dissection of both mandibular and retropharyngeal lymph nodes is easily achieved by caudal extension of the same skin incision.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/30801873/