PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How accurate is flash glucose monitoring in diabetic dogs

By Corradini, S et al.·Published in Journal of veterinary internal medicine·2016·Department of Veterinary Medical Sciences, Italy·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Accuracy of a Flash Glucose Monitoring System in Diabetic Dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

Ten diabetic dogs on insulin were monitored using a new flash glucose monitoring system (FGMS) that measures glucose levels continuously for up to 14 days. The device was placed on their necks and was found to be painless and well-tolerated, with only mild redness at the application site in some dogs. The FGMS showed a strong accuracy in measuring glucose levels, performing well across low, normal, and high ranges. This means that pet owners can use this system to effectively track their diabetic dog's glucose levels, helping to manage their condition better.

People also search for: diabetic dog glucose monitor · insulin treatment for dogs · how to manage dog diabetes

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A novel flash glucose monitoring system (FGMS) (FreeStyle Libre, Abbott, UK) was recently developed for humans. It continuously measures the interstitial glucose (IG) concentrations for 14 days. OBJECTIVES: To assess the clinical and analytical accuracy of the FGMS in diabetic dogs. ANIMALS: Ten client-owned diabetic dogs on insulin treatment. METHODS: Prospective and observational study. The FGMS was placed on the neck for up to 14 days. During the 1st-2nd, 6-7th, and 13-14th days from application, the IG measurements were compared with the plasma (EDTA) glucose (PG) concentrations analyzed by a reference hexokinase based method. RESULTS: The application and the use of the FGMS were apparently painless, easy, and well tolerated by all dogs. Mild erythema at the site of the application was found in 5/10 dogs at the end of the wearing period. A good correlation between IG and PG concentrations (rho = 0.94; P < .001) was found. The FGMS was 93, 99, and 99% accurate at low, normal, and high blood glucose concentrations. Mean &#xb1; standard deviation difference from the reference method was 2.3 &#xb1; 46.8 mg/dL. CONCLUSION AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The FGMS is easy to use and is accurate for IG glucose measurement in diabetic dogs.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27318663/