PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Ultrasound features of small mammary tumors in dogs under 2 cm

By Vannozzi, Iacopo et al.·Published in Veterinary research communications·2018·Department of Veterinary Sciences, Italy·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: B-mode ultrasound examination of canine mammary gland neoplastic lesions of small size (diameter&#x2009;<&#x2009;2&#xa0;cm).

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of female dogs with small mammary tumors (less than 2 cm) underwent ultrasound examinations to help determine if the tumors were benign or malignant. The ultrasound looked at various features of the tumors, but only changes in the surrounding tissue seemed to suggest malignancy. After the dogs had surgery to remove the tumors, the results showed that ultrasound alone wasn't very effective in telling the difference between benign and malignant tumors in these small sizes. This means that while ultrasound can help, it may not always provide clear answers for pet owners and veterinarians.

People also search for: dog mammary tumor ultrasound · small dog breast lump treatment · how to tell if dog tumor is cancerous

Abstract

Ultrasonography is a valuable tool for the evaluation of neoplastic lesions in the dog and there is a growing interest in the use of this technique for the stadiation of canine mammary tumours. An accurate assessment of small sized nodules facilitates the stadiation of the mammary lesions and helps the clinician in the choice of the most indicated surgical therapy. The aim of this study was to identify those ultrasound criteria that may be useful in discriminating between benign and malignant lesions of small size (diameter smaller than 2&#xa0;cm). Sixty-two nodules, < 2&#xa0;cm in larger diameter, belonging to thirty-five bitches presented between January 2012 and February 2014 were evaluated. Tumours were observed by conventional ultrasound and assessed for: shape (regular-irregular), limit (defined-ill-defined), margins (regular-irregular), echogenicity (hypoechoic-isoechoic-hyperecoic), echotexture (homogeneus-heterogeneus), presence of hyperecoic halo, distal acoustic enhancement or shadowing and surrounding tissue alterations. Among the alterations in surrounding tissues, the disruption of the glandular tissue and the increase in echogenicity of the peritumoral tissues were assessed. Thereafter, bitches were subjected to mastectomy and nodules were evaluated histologically. None of the ultasound criteria considered in the current study showed a statistically significant relation with malignancy, except for the presence of alterations in the tissue surrounding the nodules. According to our results, this characteristic may indicate malignancy, however its subjectivity may affect the applicability in clinical practice. In conclusions, conventional ultrasound in bitches had a limited ability in discriminating benign and malignant mammary gland neoplastic lesions of small size (diameter&#x2009;<&#x2009;2&#xa0;cm).

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29541992/