Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Bariatric artery treatment slows stomach emptying and improves blood
By Wang, Zhi et al.·Published in Diabetes, obesity & metabolism·2024·Department of Radiology, China·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Bariatric arterial embolization slows gastric emptying and improves postprandial glycaemia in obese dogs with impaired glucose tolerance.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of obese male dogs with trouble processing sugar underwent a procedure called bariatric arterial embolization (BAE) to see if it would help them. After the treatment, these dogs lost weight, their stomachs emptied more slowly, and their blood sugar levels dropped after eating glucose. This suggests that BAE could be a helpful option for managing weight and blood sugar in dogs with similar health issues.
People also search for: dog obesity treatment · bariatric surgery for dogs · managing dog blood sugar levels
Abstract
AIM: To evaluate the effects of bariatric arterial embolization (BAE) on gastric emptying of, and the glycaemic response to, an oral glucose load in an obese canine model with impaired glucose tolerance. METHODS: Eleven male dogs were fed a high-fat, high-fructose diet for 7 weeks before receiving BAE, which involved selective embolization of the left gastric artery (n = 5; 14.9 ± 0.8 kg), or the sham (n = 6; 12.6 ± 0.8 kg) procedure. Postprocedural body weight was measured weekly for 4 weeks. Prior to and at 4 weeks postprocedure, a glucose solution containingC-acetate was administered orally for evaluation of the gastric half-emptying time (T50) and the glycaemic response. The relationship between the changes in the blood glucose area under the curve over the first 60 minutes (AUC) and the T50 was also assessed. RESULTS: At 4 weeks postprocedure, BAE reduced body weight (BAE vs. the sham procedure: -5.7% ± 0.9% vs. 3.5% ± 0.9%, P < .001), slowed gastric emptying (T50 at baseline vs. postprocedure: 75.5 ± 2.0 vs. 82.5 ± 1.8 minutes, P = .021 in the BAE group; 73.8 ± 1.8 vs. 74.3 ± 1.9 minutes in the sham group) and lowered the glycaemic response to oral glucose (AUCat baseline vs. postprocedure: 99.2 ± 13.7 vs. 67.6 ± 9.8 mmol·min/L, P = .043 in the BAE group; 100.2 ± 13.4 vs. 103.9 ± 14.6 mmol·min/L in the sham group). The change in the glucose AUCcorrelated inversely with that of the T50 (r = -0.711; P = .014). CONCLUSIONS: In a canine model with impaired glucose tolerance, BAE, while reducing body weight, slowed gastric emptying and attenuated the glycaemic response to an oral glucose load.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39075922/