PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Campylobacter Species and Neutrophilic Inflammatory Bowel Disease in Cats.

Journal:
Journal of veterinary internal medicine
Year:
2016
Authors:
Maunder, C L et al.
Affiliation:
School of Veterinary Sciences · United Kingdom
Species:
cat

Plain-English summary

This study looked at a group of cats with a type of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) that involves a specific kind of inflammation called neutrophilic inflammation. Researchers found that a bacteria called Campylobacter coli was present in most of the cats with this type of IBD, but only in a small number of cats with another type of IBD. The presence of Campylobacter coli was linked to higher levels of neutrophils, which are a type of white blood cell that responds to inflammation. This suggests that the bacteria might be causing the inflammation or attracting the immune cells. Understanding this connection could help veterinarians treat cats with neutrophilic IBD more effectively and reduce any risks to humans.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a common cause of signs of gastrointestinal disease in cats. A subset of cats with IBD has neutrophilic inflammation of the intestinal mucosa. HYPOTHESIS: Neutrophilic enteritis in cats is associated with mucosal invasion by microorganisms, and specifically Campylobacter spp. ANIMALS: Seven cats with neutrophilic IBD and 8 cats with lymphoplasmacytic IBD. METHODS: Retrospective review of duodenal biopsy specimens that were collected endoscopically for histologic examination. Cases were identified and selected by searching the histopathology archive for cats with a diagnosis of neutrophilic and lymphoplasmacytic IBD. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) targeting either all eubacteria or individual Campylobacter spp. was performed on archived samples. Neutrophils were detected on the same samples using a FISH probe for neutrophil elastase. RESULTS: Campylobacter coli was present in (6/7) cats with neutrophilic IBD and in (1/8) cats with lymphoplasmacytic IBD (P = .009). Cats with neutrophilic IBD had significantly higher number of C. coli (median bacteria 0.7/hpf) in the mucosa than cats with lymphoplasmacytic IBD (median bacteria 0/hpf) (P = 0.002). Colocalization of neutrophils and C. coli was demonstrated, with C. coli closer to the neutrophils than any other bacteria (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: Identification of C. coli associated with neutrophilic inflammation suggests that C. coli is able either to produce compounds which stimulate neutrophils or to induce feline intestinal cells to produce neutrophil chemoattractants. This association should allow a directed therapeutic approach in cats with neutrophilic IBD, potentially improving outcome and reducing any zoonotic risk.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27362482/