PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

CT angiography helps predict if dog liver tumors can be removed

By Smola, Christopher et al.·Published in Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association·2023·1BluePearl Veterinary Partners-Philadelphia Network·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Computed tomography angiography aids in predicting resectability of isolated liver tumors in dogs.

Species:
dog
Canine mammary tumorsStomach & digestionDogs

Plain-English summary

A group of 20 dogs with isolated liver tumors underwent a special imaging test called CT angiography (CTA) to help determine if their tumors could be surgically removed. The results showed that most of the tumors (17 out of 21) were able to be removed during surgery, although two of them were not completely excised when examined afterward. The imaging helped predict how difficult the surgery would be and identified factors that could affect the success of the surgery. Overall, using CTA was beneficial for planning the treatment of these liver tumors in dogs.

People also search for: dog liver tumor surgery · CT angiography for dogs · liver cancer treatment in dogs

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the accuracy of CT angiography (CTA) in predicting resectability, degree of surgical difficulty, and individual factors that may impact resectability of isolated hepatic masses in dogs. ANIMALS: Prospective study of 20 dogs with 21 isolated hepatic masses. PROCEDURES: All CTAs and surgeries were performed between June 16, 2013, and November 30, 2016, at The Animal Medical Center in New York. Preoperative CTA images were evaluated by a board-certified surgeon (n = 2). A preoperative assessment was completed, documenting several predetermined factors aimed at predicting resectability of each mass and the degree of surgical difficulty. Resectability was divided into gross resectability and complete histologic excision. Following surgery, the surgeon completed a postoperative assessment documenting the intraoperative findings. Independently, a blinded board-certified radiologist analyzed the images and completed an identical preoperative assessment. RESULTS: The radiologist was more accurate in lesion localization compared to the surgeon (P = .023). Seventeen (17/21) masses were grossly resectable in surgery. Two additional (2/21) masses that were deemed grossly resectable were incompletely excised on histopathologic analysis. Both the surgeon and radiologist were accurate in their prediction of gross resectability and complete excision. Major vascular involvement, multilobar involvement, and right-sided laterality negatively affected resectability. The surgeon was significantly more accurate in predicting the degree of surgical difficulty (κ = 0.50) when compared to the radiologist (κ = 0.38). CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Preoperative CTA of isolated hepatic masses is useful in prediction of surgical difficulty and resectability, as well as identifying several factors that impact resectability.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/37339772/