PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

How accurate is fine-needle biopsy for dog mammary tumors

By Sontas, B H et al.·Published in Reproduction in domestic animals = Zuchthygiene·2012·Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Fine-needle aspiration biopsy of canine mammary gland tumours: a comparison between cytology and histopathology.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

A group of 55 female dogs with mammary tumors underwent fine-needle aspiration (a quick way to collect cells) to help diagnose their conditions before surgery. The results showed that while this method is generally accurate, about 28% of the samples were not sufficient for a clear diagnosis. Out of the remaining samples, most were found to be malignant (cancerous), but some were benign (non-cancerous). The study suggests that fine-needle aspiration can be a useful tool for diagnosing mammary tumors in dogs, but it’s important to ensure good quality samples for the best results.

People also search for: dog mammary tumor diagnosis · fine-needle aspiration for dog tumors · canine breast cancer treatment

Abstract

In the current study, a total of 90 mammary neoplasms obtained from 55 female dogs were used to determine the accuracy of fine-needle aspiration cytology in the diagnosis of canine mammary tumours and to investigate the feasibility of this technique for the differentiation of simple tumours from complex or mixed tumours. Three aspirations were performed on each mammary gland mass using a 22-gauge needle attached to a 5-ml syringe before the mammary glands were surgically excised and submitted for histopathological examination. Twenty-five (27.7%) of 90 samples were classified as insufficient/inadequate for diagnosis. Of the remaining 65 samples, six (9.2%) were benign, 51 (78.5%) were malignant tumours and 8 (12.3%) were suspicious. Histopathological examination of the 90 specimens revealed five (5.6%) benign, 84 (93.3%) malignant and one (1.1%) non-neoplastic lesion. The diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity and specificity of cytologic examination for diagnosing malignancy were 96.5%, 96.2% and 100%, respectively. However, when inadequate (n = 25) and suspicious (n = 8) samples were included, the diagnostic accuracy and sensitivity decreased to 63.3% and 60.7%, respectively, but no change was observed in the specificity. Furthermore, it was not possible to differentiate simple tumours from complex and mixed tumours because spindle cells were seen in both 28% of the simple tumours and 39.3% of the complex or mix tumours. In conclusion, we believe that fine-needle aspiration cytology of canine mammary tumours is a valuable diagnostic tool, although our results indicated lower accuracy when inadequate samples were taken into consideration.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21615802/