Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How often do cats have acute hemolysis after dog blood transfusions
By E. Tinson et al.·Published in Journal of feline medicine and surgery·2022·View original on Semantic Scholar →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Incidence of acute haemolysis in cats receiving canine packed red blood cells (xenotransfusions)
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of cats received blood transfusions from dogs and some experienced acute hemolysis, which is when their red blood cells break down too quickly. Out of 53 cats, 13 had this reaction, but only 4 were classified as serious cases. The survival rate for cats with acute hemolysis was 50%, while those without serious reactions had a 40% survival rate. This study highlights that while using dog blood can be necessary in emergencies, it can lead to complications in cats, and they may need another transfusion sooner than expected.
People also search for: cat blood transfusion reaction · acute hemolysis in cats · dog blood for cat transfusion · feline transfusion complications
Abstract
Objectives The aim of this study was to report the incidence of transfusion reactions in cats, including acute haemolysis (AH), occurring within 24 h of receiving a xenotransfusion. An additional aim was to determine whether cases with AH could be classified as having an acute haemolytic transfusion reaction (AHTR) as per the definition provided by the Association of Veterinary Haematology and Transfusion Medicine’s Transfusion Reaction Small Animal Consensus Statement. Methods Medical records of cats that received canine packed red blood cells (PRBCs) between July 2018 and September 2020 at a veterinary hospital were reviewed. The incidence of AH, AHTRs, febrile non-haemolytic transfusion reactions (FNHTRs), transfusion-associated circulatory overload and septic transfusion reactions were recorded. Results The medical records of 53 cats were retrospectively evaluated. Twenty-three (43%) cats had transfusion reactions. Thirteen (25%) cats had AH; however, only four (8%) met the definition of an AHTR. Ten (19%) cats were determined to have FNHTRs. Survival to discharge of cats affected by AH was 50% (25% for cases that met the definition of an AHTR). Survival to discharge of cats not suffering from AHTR was 40%. Conclusions and relevance This report indicates that a higher proportion of cats undergo AH (25%) when administered canine PRBCs than previously reported, although many could not be classed as having an AHTR due to an apparently adequate packed cell volume rise. Challenges with sourcing feline blood in emergency situations occasionally necessitates the use of xenotransfusion in transfusion medicine. Clinicians should be aware that haemolysis after xenotransfusion can occur within 24 h and that a repeat feline transfusion may be required sooner than anticipated in some cases.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on Semantic Scholar: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/36475918