Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Acute hemolysis in cats after dog blood transfusions - what to know
By Tinson, Erica et al.·Published in Journal of feline medicine and surgery·2022·Queen Mother Hospital for Animals, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Incidence of acute haemolysis in cats receiving canine packed red blood cells (xenotransfusions).
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of cats received blood transfusions from dogs and some experienced serious reactions. Out of 53 cats, 23 had transfusion reactions, with 13 showing signs of acute hemolysis (a dangerous breakdown of red blood cells). Unfortunately, only half of the cats with this reaction survived, and those that met the strict criteria for a severe reaction had an even lower survival rate. This study highlights the risks of using dog blood for transfusions in cats, especially in emergencies when feline blood is hard to find.
People also search for: cat blood transfusion reaction · acute hemolysis in cats · dog blood for cat transfusion · cat transfusion survival rate · feline blood donor options
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to report the incidence of transfusion reactions in cats, including acute haemolysis (AH), occurring within 24 h of receiving a xenotransfusion. An additional aim was to determine whether cases with AH could be classified as having an acute haemolytic transfusion reaction (AHTR) as per the definition provided by the Association of Veterinary Haematology and Transfusion Medicine's Transfusion Reaction Small Animal Consensus Statement. METHODS: Medical records of cats that received canine packed red blood cells (PRBCs) between July 2018 and September 2020 at a veterinary hospital were reviewed. The incidence of AH, AHTRs, febrile non-haemolytic transfusion reactions (FNHTRs), transfusion-associated circulatory overload and septic transfusion reactions were recorded. RESULTS: The medical records of 53 cats were retrospectively evaluated. Twenty-three (43%) cats had transfusion reactions. Thirteen (25%) cats had AH; however, only four (8%) met the definition of an AHTR. Ten (19%) cats were determined to have FNHTRs. Survival to discharge of cats affected by AH was 50% (25% for cases that met the definition of an AHTR). Survival to discharge of cats not suffering from AHTR was 40%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: This report indicates that a higher proportion of cats undergo AH (25%) when administered canine PRBCs than previously reported, although many could not be classed as having an AHTR due to an apparently adequate packed cell volume rise. Challenges with sourcing feline blood in emergency situations occasionally necessitates the use of xenotransfusion in transfusion medicine. Clinicians should be aware that haemolysis after xenotransfusion can occur within 24 h and that a repeat feline transfusion may be required sooner than anticipated in some cases.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/36475918/