Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
No papillomavirus found in benign dog Meibomian gland tumors unlike
By Rushtlion, Victoria et al.·Published in Frontiers in veterinary science·2026·Department of Comparative Pathobiology, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Papillomavirus is not detected in benign neoplasms of the canine Meibomian gland despite evidence of HPV-mediated tumorigenesis in the human Meibomian gland.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of dogs with Meibomian gland tumors, which are growths near the eyelids, were studied to see if a virus called Canine Papillomavirus (CPV) was involved in their development. Researchers found that out of 106 cases, 102 were confirmed to be benign tumors, but none showed signs of the virus. The study noted that younger dogs were more likely to have adenomas (a type of benign tumor) compared to epitheliomas, but overall, the tumors did not appear to be caused by a virus. This means that treatment options for these tumors can focus on surgical removal without concern for viral involvement.
People also search for: dog eyelid tumor treatment · Meibomian gland tumor in dogs · benign tumors in dogs · Canine Papillomavirus in dogs
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Meibomian gland (MG) tumors are common in dogs. Papillomaviruses have been detected in epithelial neoplasms across species, including those arising from the human MG, but their role in the development of canine MG tumors has not been investigated. The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether Canine Papillomavirus (CPV) contributes to MG tumorigenesis. METHODS: A retrospective review of a Laboratory Information Management System (LIMS) was performed to identify cases of canine MG tumors submitted between 2019 and 2024. DNA was extracted from archival FFPE tissue scrolls, and PCR was performed using validated viral CPV-1 E6 and L1 primers. Clinicopathologic features including patient age and sex, tumor size, tumor laterality and location, presence of chalazion, mitotic count, and extent of surgical excision were evaluated. RESULTS: LIMS review yielded 106 cases of canine MG tumors, and 102 were histologically confirmed to be MG adenomas or epitheliomas. PCR was performed on 99 samples, and no viral amplicons were detected in any MG tumor. Dogs with adenomas were younger than those with epitheliomas. There were no differences in sex or alteration status between tumor groups, and Labrador retrievers and Poodles were overrepresented. There were no differences between tumor types in terms of laterality or upper vs. lower eyelid. Adenomas were smaller and had lower mitotic counts compared to epitheliomas. The presence of chalazion or completeness of the surgical excision was not different between tumor subtypes. CONCLUSION: While we confirm consistent morphologic and phenotypic differences between canine MG adenomas and epitheliomas, these results suggest that, unlike their human counterparts, neither tumor subtype is virally mediated.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42038048/