PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Penile amputation and scrotal urethrostomy surgery in 18 dogs outcomes

By Burrow, R D et al.·Published in The Veterinary record·2011·The Royal Veterinary College, United Kingdom·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Penile amputation and scrotal urethrostomy in 18 dogs.

Species:
dog

Plain-English summary

An 8-year-old male dog was brought in for surgery due to a tumor on his penis. The veterinarian performed a penile amputation and a scrotal urethrostomy (a procedure to reroute urine) to treat the issue. After surgery, most dogs experienced mild bleeding from the surgical site for a few weeks, but they generally recovered well. However, two dogs with tumors had complications and were later euthanized due to cancer recurrence. Overall, dogs without cancer had excellent long-term outcomes after the procedure.

People also search for: dog penis surgery recovery · penile amputation in dogs · dog urethrostomy complications

Abstract

The objective of this study was to report the signalment, indications for surgery, postoperative complications and outcome in dogs undergoing penile amputation and scrotal urethrostomy. Medical records of three surgical referral facilities were reviewed for dogs undergoing penile amputation and scrotal urethrostomy between January 2003 and July 2010. Data collected included signalment, presenting signs, indication for penile amputation, surgical technique, postoperative complications and long-term outcome. Eighteen dogs were included in the study. Indications for surgery were treatment of neoplasia (n=6), external or unknown penile trauma (n=4), penile trauma or necrosis associated with urethral obstruction with calculi (n=3), priapism (n=4) and balanoposthitis (n=1). All dogs suffered mild postoperative haemorrhage (posturination and/or spontaneous) from the urethrostomy stoma for up to 21 days (mean 5.5 days). Four dogs had minor complications recorded at suture removal (minor dehiscence (n=1), mild bruising and swelling around the urethrostomy site and mild haemorrhage at suture removal (n=2), and granulation at the edge of stoma (n=1)). One dog had a major complication (wound dehiscence and subsequent stricture of the stoma). Long-term outcome was excellent in all dogs with non-neoplastic disease. Local tumour recurrence and/or metastatic disease occurred within five to 12 months of surgery in two dogs undergoing penile amputation for the treatment of neoplasia. Both dogs were euthanased.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21968541/