Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Protection from reinfection in cats with Mycoplasma turicensis
By Novacco, Marilisa et al.·Published in Veterinary research·2012·Vetsuisse Faculty·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Protection from reinfection in "Candidatus Mycoplasma turicensis"-infected cats and characterization of the immune response.
- Species:
- cat
Plain-English summary
A group of cats infected with "Candidatus Mycoplasma turicensis" (CMt) showed that those who recovered from the infection were protected from getting sick again when re-exposed to the bacteria. In this study, 10 previously infected cats were re-inoculated, and none developed detectable infections, while the control group of 5 naive cats did become infected. The recovered cats had some changes in their immune response, including a temporary drop in antibodies and an increase in certain immune cells. This suggests that once cats recover from CMt, they may have lasting protection against future infections.
People also search for: cat Mycoplasma turicensis infection · cat immune response to bacteria · how to protect cat from reinfection
Abstract
"Candidatus Mycoplasma turicensis" (CMt) is a hemoplasma species of felids. Recent evidence has shown that cats that overcome bacteremia may be protected from reinfection. The purposes of this study were to (1) re-inoculate ostensibly recovered cats, (2) evaluate the immune response and (3) assess CMt tissue loads. Fifteen specified pathogen-free cats were subcutaneously inoculated with CMt: 10 cats (group A) had previously undergone bacteremia and recovered, and 5 naïve cats (group B) served as controls. CMt infections were monitored by real-time PCR using blood and tissue, and the humoral immune response was assessed using DnaK ELISA. Cytokine mRNA expression levels were measured by real-time PCR, and lymphocyte subsets were detected by flow cytometry. The cats in group A were protected from reinfection (no detectable bacteremia) and showed a transient decrease in antibodies. Eosinophilia was noted in cats from group A. The cats from group B became PCR-positive and seroconverted. All of the tissues analyzed from the cats in group B but none of the tissues analyzed from the cats in group A were CMt PCR-positive. Significant changes were observed in the expression of tumor necrosis factor-α, interferon-γ, interleukin-4 and the Th2/Th1 ratio in both groups. The cats from group A occasionally showed higher numbers of CD4+, CD8+, CD4+CD25+ and CD5+MHCII+ T lymphocytes than the control cats. In conclusion, this study describes, for the first time, the occurrence of immunological protection within the same hemoplasma species. Furthermore, the immune response during CMt infections appeared to be skewed toward the Th2 type.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/23216686/