Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
How blood tests HbA1c and fructosamine show diabetes control in dogs
By Norris, Olga & Schermerhorn, Thomas·Published in PloS one·2022·Department of Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Relationship between HbA1c, fructosamine and clinical assessment of glycemic control in dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 28 dogs with diabetes were tested to see how well two blood tests, HbA1c and fructosamine, could indicate how well their diabetes was being managed. The clinical assessment showed that half of the dogs had good control of their diabetes, while 82% had acceptable control. The HbA1c test was found to be more reliable than the fructosamine test in reflecting the dogs' diabetes management. While HbA1c is a helpful tool for monitoring, it should be used along with other tests for the best results in managing diabetic dogs.
People also search for: dog diabetes management · HbA1c test for dogs · fructosamine test in dogs
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Serum fructosamine is a routine test used for clinical monitoring of diabetes mellitus (DM) but the usefulness of HbA1c for this purpose has not been extensively studied. HYPOTHESIS: The study aimed to compare the ability of blood HbA1c and serum fructosamine tests to correctly classify DM control determined using a clinically-based assessment. ANIMALS: 28 client-owned dogs with naturally-occurring diabetes mellitus. METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study. Ability of fructosamine and HbA1c tests to classify diabetes control in dogs was determined. RESULTS: Clinical assessment classified 50% of dogs as having good diabetic control and 82% as having acceptable diabetic control. Analysis using Cohen's kappa test showed that agreements between fructosamine and HbA1c results and the clinical assessment ranged from poor to fair. Fructosamine and HbA1c results from each dog showed a moderate correlation. Overall, the HbA1c test showed the best agreement with the clinical assessment when diabetes control was considered either acceptable or unacceptable, although the strength of agreement was considered fair (kappa = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL IMPORTANCE: The HbA1c concentration was found to be more consistent with clinical evaluation of diabetes control than was the serum fructosamine concentration. The HbA1c level is a useful tool for assessment of glycemic status in diabetic dogs but should be used alongside other tests for outpatient monitoring of clinically stable diabetic dogs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35213623/