PetCaseFinder

Peer-reviewed veterinary case report

Stem cell therapy before full tooth removal not effective for cats

By Arzi, Boaz et al.·Published in Journal of feline medicine and surgery·2021·Department of Surgical and Radiological Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed

PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →

Original publication title: Stem cell therapy prior to full-mouth tooth extraction lacks substantial clinical efficacy in cats affected by chronic gingivostomatitis.

Species:
cat

Plain-English summary

A group of five cats with chronic gingivostomatitis (FCGS), a painful mouth condition, received stem cell therapy before their scheduled full-mouth tooth extractions. While the treatment was safe, it did not significantly improve their symptoms; three cats showed no positive change, and only two had a mild response. After six months, there was no evidence that the stem cells helped the cats' immune systems either. Based on these results, veterinarians do not recommend using this stem cell treatment before tooth extractions for cats with FCGS.

People also search for: cat gingivostomatitis treatment · stem cell therapy for cats · cat tooth extraction recovery · chronic mouth pain in cats

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this pilot study was to determine the safety, efficacy and immunomodulatory function of systemically administered adipose-derived mesenchymal stem cells (ASCs) in cats affected by feline chronic gingivostomatitis (FCGS) prior to full-mouth tooth extractions. METHODS: Five client-owned cats affected with FCGS that did not undergo full-mouth tooth extractions for FCGS treatment received two intravenous injections of 20 million fresh, allogeneic or autologous ASCs. An oral examination with photographs, a complete blood count, blood immune cell phenotyping and a biochemical profile were completed at 0 and 6 months after treatment. RESULTS: Four cats completed the study and one cat exited the study 3 months after treatment. While the treatment was determined to be clinically safe, no positive clinical response was observed in three cats and a mild response was noted in two cats. Furthermore, none of the cats exhibited immune modulation, as evidenced by no alteration in circulating CD8T cells, normalization of the CD4:CD8 ratio or neutrophil counts. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Unlike the reported efficacy of ASCs in treating cats with non-responsive FCGS after full-mouth tooth extraction, the systemic administration of ASCs prior to full-mouth tooth extraction lacks substantial clinical efficacy and is not recommended at this time.

Find similar cases for your pet

PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.

Search related cases →

Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33118849/