Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Surgical removal of rectal tumors in 23 dogs using anal approach
By Danova, Nichole A et al.·Published in Veterinary surgery : VS·2006·Department of Surgical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: Surgical excision of primary canine rectal tumors by an anal approach in twenty-three dogs.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A group of 23 dogs with rectal tumors underwent surgery using an anal approach, which involved prolapsing the rectum to remove the tumors. The types of tumors included adenocarcinomas and polyps, among others. Most dogs experienced mild complications like rectal bleeding or discomfort, which resolved within a week. After surgery, the average time before any signs of cancer returned was about 36 months, with some dogs remaining cancer-free for over seven years. This method proved to be a successful option for treating rectal tumors in dogs.
People also search for: dog rectal tumor surgery · canine anal tumor treatment · dog rectal bleeding after surgery · dog cancer survival rates · dog rectal polyp removal
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To describe an anal approach for excision of primary rectal tumors in dogs and to report outcome. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. ANIMALS: Dogs (n=23) with primary rectal tumors. METHODS: Review of medical records (1990-2000) of dogs with primary rectal neoplasia excised surgically using an anal approach with rectal prolapse. With dogs anesthetized, the rectum was prolapsed, stabilized with stay sutures during tumor excision with 1 cm margins to the level of the muscularis, then the rectal mucosa was sutured. RESULTS: Each dog had only 1 tumor type (adenocarcinoma [8], solitary polyp [5], carcinoma [4], plasmacytoma [2], adenoma [1], leiomyoma [1], mucinous carcinoma [1], and papilloma [1]). Mean tumor volume was 3.1 cm(3) (range 0.1-37.7 cm(3)). Postoperative complications (rectal bleeding [5], tenesmus [4]) were mild and resolved within 7 days after surgery; another dog had partial mucosal dehiscence identified at 6 days. The primary tumor was incompletely excised in 1 dog (4.3%), and local recurrence occurred 16 and 24 months after surgery in 2 dogs. Outcome beyond the immediate postoperative period was known for 18 dogs, including 2 dogs still alive. Mean postoperative disease-free interval for these 18 dogs was 36.8 months (range 5-84 months). CONCLUSION: Surgical excision of tumors of the caudal rectum can be accomplished through the anus after rectal prolapse. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: An anal approach facilitated by rectal prolapse should be considered as a viable option for the surgical treatment of selected cases of tumors of the caudal aspect of the rectum in dogs.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16756613/