Peer-reviewed veterinary case report
Accuracy of FreeStyle Libre 2 glucose monitor in healthy dogs
By Herman, Jessica L et al.·Published in American journal of veterinary research·2025·Department of Small Animal Clinical Sciences, United States·View original on PubMed →
PetCaseFinder translated the abstract of this peer-reviewed paper into plain English so pet owners can read it. We do not publish original research — every detail traces back to the citation above. How we work →
Original publication title: The FreeStyle Libre 2 system demonstrates limited analytical accuracy without resulting in detrimental clinical decisions.
- Species:
- dog
Plain-English summary
A study tested the FreeStyle Libre 2 glucose monitoring system on 23 healthy dogs to see how accurately it measured blood sugar during induced low blood sugar (hypoglycemia). While the device showed limited accuracy compared to standard blood tests, it rarely gave readings that could lead to harmful decisions for the dogs' care. This means that while the FreeStyle Libre 2 can help track glucose trends, pet owners and vets should be cautious when interpreting its results, especially during quick changes in blood sugar levels.
People also search for: dog blood sugar monitor · FreeStyle Libre 2 accuracy · hypoglycemia in dogs symptoms
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of a second-generation flash glucose monitoring system (FGMS; FreeStyle Libre 2) in nondiabetic dogs during rapidly induced hypoglycemia. METHODS: In a prospective, observational study, regular insulin was administered to 23 healthy dogs to induce hypoglycemia, with subsequent correction. Serial measurements of interstitial glucose with FGMS and blood glucose (BG) with a portable BG monitor (PBGM) were recorded every 10 minutes for 90 minutes. At each time point, blood was also collected for gold standard BG measurement via clinical chemistry analyzer. Analytical and clinical accuracy was determined by fulfillment of International Organization for Standardization 15197:2013 criteria. RESULTS: For BG values < 100 mg/dL, 67.2% of PBGM measurements and 50.9% of FGMS measurements were within ± 15 mg/dL of the reference method. In Parkes error grid analysis, 94.9% of PBGM and 88.6% of FGMS measurements fell within zones A and B. Readings within higher-risk zones were rare, with no PBGM values and 0.6% of FGMS values in zone D and neither producing readings in zone E. CONCLUSIONS: In this model of rapidly induced hypoglycemia, the FGMS demonstrated limited analytical accuracy compared to the reference standard. However, it rarely produced glucose readings likely to lead to detrimental clinical decisions. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The FreeStyle Libre 2 is clinically useful for monitoring glucose trends in dogs, though results should be interpreted with caution during periods of rapid glycemic change.
Find similar cases for your pet
PetCaseFinder finds other peer-reviewed reports of pets with the same symptoms, plus a plain-English summary of what was tried across them.
Search related cases →Original publication on PubMed: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/40280161/